A video comparing two clips of PM Modi’s interactions with Indians abroad and in India is widely shared on social media. The claim accompanying the video suggests that PM Modi is discriminatory towards Indians in India and refuses to touch them. Let’s verify the claim made in the post.
Claim: Visuals of PM Modi refraining from touching Indians in India suggesting his discriminatory attitude.
Fact: While it is true that in the specific clip mentioned, PM Modi refrained from physical contact with the children, this alone cannot be interpreted as evidence of discriminatory behaviour towards Indians in India. PM Modi has been actively engaged with individuals from diverse backgrounds throughout the country on numerous occasions. Furthermore, it should be noted that there are instances where PM Modi did not engage in physical contact with the Indian diaspora during his foreign trips, which can be attributed to various reasons. Therefore, it is not feasible to draw sweeping conclusions based solely on this specific clip, as it fails to consider the overall pattern of PM Modi’s interactions. Hence, the claim made in the post is MISLEADING.
Upon conducting a reverse image search on the viral video, it was discovered that the first clip features PM Modi engaging with the Indian diaspora in Australia during his recent visit in May 2023. Likewise, the second clip captures PM Modi’s interaction with children who find themselves confined behind barbed wire. This footage was recorded during his campaign for the 2023 Karnataka Assembly elections in Kalaburagi.
While the full video showcasing Modi’s interaction with children behind barbed wires does reveal that he refrains from physical contact, it is important to note the existence of numerous instances where he has actively engaged with people from diverse backgrounds in India. Some of them can be seen here, here, and here. It is crucial to recognize that these individual instances alone do not provide conclusive evidence of discriminatory behaviour or the practice of untouchability by PM Modi.
Additionally, there have been instances where PM Modi did not engage in physical interactions with the Indian diaspora during his foreign trips. This can be attributed to various factors such as security concerns, unforeseen events, or conflicting schedules. These examples highlight the reality that physical interaction may not always be feasible and is subject to a range of circumstances. It is important to consider these factors when evaluating the absence of physical contact in certain instances, as it does not necessarily indicate a deliberate or discriminatory approach.
To sum it up, an isolated occurrence of PM Modi refraining from physical contact with children is being shared to portray him as discriminatory towards Indians in India.
